Oneness Debates | Debates | The Global Impact Ministries

DEBATEs and video responses

Response to Oneness Pentecostalism Debunked, Pastor Steven Anderson, Part 1

Anderson vs. Ritchie

Published on Feb 1, 2018

Most Trinitarian apologists construct their own distorted view of Oneness theology and then attack that false view while pretending to have debunked Oneness. Pastor Steven Anderson is no different. He repeatedly affirms that Oneness Pentecostalism denies any ontological distinction between God the Father and his newly assumed human mode of existence as a true human son. In this video, Oneness apologist Steven Ritchie refutes Trinitarian theology from the scriptures cited by Pastor Anderson. For even the scriptures cited to refute Oneness theology actually debunks Trinitarian theology while supporting Oneness.

Response to "Pentecostal Oneness Doctrine Debunked"

Pastor Steven L Anderson, Part 2

The Mark of the Beast & Modalism (Oneness Pentecostalism), Response to Steve Anderson

Oneness vs Trinity Debate: Ritchie vs Dalcour, Did Jesus Pre-exist as A God the Son?

Dalcour vs. Ritchie

Published on Jan 11, 2018

A short theological debate showing the doctrinal distinctions between Oneness and Trinitarian Theologies regarding the identity of Jesus Christ. The debate was held in Los Angeles, California on January 6th, 2018.

related videos

Response to Dr. Edward Dalcour on Oneness/Sobre la Unicidad

Trinitarian Theologians Disagree About The Trinity

Trinitarian Theologian Distort Oneness Pentecostal Theology

The Bible Says God Is One Person

Edward Dalcour Misquotes Scripture To Support Trinity, John 17:5, Philippians 2:6

The Glory Which I Had With You, John 17:5

Does The Form of God Mean A Nature? Philippians 2:6

Ritchie vs. Dalcour, Ritchie vs. Dalcour, Post Debate Comments Response Part 1

Oneness vs. Trinity Debate, Ritchie vs. Dalcour, Post Debate Comments Response Part 2

Oneness vs. Trinity Debate: Ritchie vs. Dalcour, Cross Exam Response Part 3

Easy Navigator

RESPONSE TO TRINITARIANISM

Sam Shamoun:

Part 1| DOES THE BIBLE TEACH TRINITY OR ONENESS IN THE OLD TESTAMENT?

Pastor Steven Anderson:

Part 1| RESPONSE TO ONENESS PENTECOSTALISM DEBUNKED

Part 2| RESPONSE TO "PENTECOSTAL ONENESS DOCTRINE DEBUNKED" PASTOR STEVEN ANDERSON

THE MARK OF THE BEAST & MODALISM (ONENESS PENTECOSTALISM)

Dr. Edward Dalcour:

RITCHIE vs DALCOUR, DID JESUS PRE-EXIST AS A GOD THE SON?

Part 1| RESPONSE TO DR. EDWARD DALCOUR ON ONENESS / SOBRE LA UNICIDAD

Part 2| TRINITARIAN THEOLOGIANS DISAGREE ABOUT THE TRINITY, RESPONSE TO DR. EDWARD DALCOUR

Part 3| TRINITARIAN THEOLOGIAN DISTORTS ONENESS PENTECOSTAL THEOLOGY

Part 4| THE BIBLE SAYS GOD IS ONE PERSON

Part 5| EDWARD DALCOUR MISQUOTES SCRIPTURE TO SUPPORT TRINITY, JOHN 17:5, PHILIPPIANS 2:6

Part 6| THE GLORY WHICH I HAD WITH YOU, JOHN 17:5

Part 7| DOES THE FORM OF GOD MEAN A NATURE? PHILIPPIANS 2:6

RITCHIE vs DALCOUR, RESPONSE TO JOHN 1:1, THE WORD WAS WITH GOD PART1

ONENESS VS TRINIT DEBATE, RITCHIE VS DALCOUR, POST DEBATE COMMENTS RESPONSE PART2

ONENESS VS. TRINITY DEBATE: RITCHIE VS DALCOUR, CROSS EXAM RESPONSE PART3

Robert Skynner:

RESPONSE TO “HOW TO REFUTE A ONENESS PENTECOSTAL IN 60 SECONDS”

James White:

TRINITY vs ONENESS : JAMES WHITE vs STEVE RITCHIE (VIDEO RESPONSE)

ONENESS VS. TRINITY DEBATE: DR. JAMES WHITE, ‘A LITTLE ONENESS,’ ONENESS RESPONSE FROM STEVE RITCHIE

Jon MacArthur:

PENTECOSTALS ONENESS HERESIES, ONENESS RESPONSE

David Bercot:

WHAT THE EARLY CHRISTIANS BELIEVED ABOUT THE TRINITY, ONENESS VS. TRINITY

Ethan Smith

IS JEHOVAH TRI-PERSONAL OR UNI-PERSONAL?

TRINITARIAN CONTRADICTION

Dr. Steve Morrison:

ONENESS vs TRINITY DEBATE (PART 1 AND 2)

ONENESS vs TRINITY DEBATE (PART 3 AND 4)

ONENESS vs TRINITY DEBATE (LOST PART OF PART 4)

RESPONSE TO CAnswersTV REVIEW OF RITCHIE vs MORRISON

Part 1| TRINITY VS. ONENESS (MODALISM) IN CHURCH HISTORY, CHRISTIAN HISTORY

Part 2| ONENESS MODALISM, THE POPULAR BELIEF IN ANCIENT CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

Part 3| THE FIRST CHRISTIAN TO USE THE WORD TRINITY

Part 4| THE THEOLOGY OF IRENAEUS: RESPONSE TO DR. MORRISON

Part 5| THE EARLY ROMAN CHURCH WAS ONENESS

Part 6| DID SABELLIUS TEACH PATRIPASSIAN SEQUENTIAL MODALISM?

Part 7| THE THEOLOGY OF THE MONTANISTS

Part 8| THE EARLY ONENESS (MODALISTIC) CHRISTIANS WERE PENTECOSTALS

Part 9| THE THEOLOGY OF THE SEMI-ARIANS

Part 10| THE MAJORITY OF THE EARLIEST CHRISTIANS WERE ONENESS, RESPONSE TO DR. MORRISON

Part 11| ONENESS MODALISM INFLUENCED THE NICENE CREED, RESPONSE TO DR. MORRISON

Richard Bushey

IS WATER BAPTISM NECESSARY FOR SALVATION?

William Albrecht

TRINITY vs ONENESS IN CHURCH HISTORY

TRINITY vs ONENESS IN CHURCH HISTORY (PART 2)

TRINITY vs ONENESS IN CHURCH HISTORY (PART 3)

TRINITY vs ONENESS DEBATE

Bruce Bennett

IS GOD ONE PERSON or THREE PERSONS?

Michael Burgos

TRINITY vs ONENESS DEBATE

UNITARIANISM AND ARIANISM

PART 1 ONENESS VS ARIANISM DIALOGUE DEBATE

A REFUTATION OF UNITARIAN SOCINIANISM AND ARIANISM

Andrew Denny

DECODING PRECEPTS OF ONENESS THEOLOGY, BY ANDREW M. DENNY PROMOTES UNITARIANISM

ONENESS MODALISM VS UNITARIAN SOCINIANISM

Tom Raddatz

PART 1 ONENESS VS. UNITARIANISM DEBATE , RESPONSE TO UNITARIAN TOM RADDATZ

PART 2 ONENESS VS UNITARIANISM DEBATE , RESPONSE TO UNITARIAN TOM RADDATZ

PART 3 ONENESS VS UNITARIANISM DEBATE , RESPONSE TO UNITARIAN TOM RADDATZ

PART 4 ONENESS VS UNITARIANISM DEBATE , RESPONSE TO UNITARIAN TOM RADDATZ

PART 5 ONENESS VS UNITARIANISM DEBATE , RESPONSE TO UNITARIAN TOM RADDATZ

PART 6 ONENESS VS UNITARIANISM DEBATE , RESPONSE TO UNITARIAN TOM RADDATZ, CONCLUSION

Responses To Trinitarianism

Trinity vs Oneness Debate: Does the Bible Teach Trinity or Oneness in the Old Testament?, Part 1

Shamoun vs. Ritchie

Published on July 20,2019

The Oneness vs. Trinity Debate was held in Fort Myers Florida on July 13th. The first night of the debate covered the Old Testament while the second night of the debate covered the New Testament. Sam Shamoun is the debater for the Trinity and Steven Ritchie is the debater for Oneness.

Trinity vs Oneness Debate: Does the Bible Teach Trinity or Oneness in the NT? Part 2

Shamoun vs. Ritchie

Published on July 26,2019

The Oneness vs. Trinity Debate was held in Fort Myers Florida on July 13th and 14th, 2019. The first night of the debate covered the Old Testament while the second night of the debate covered the New Testament. Sam Shamoun is the debater for the Trinity and Steven Ritchie is the debater for Oneness.

Sam Shamoun Perverts Scripture

Sam Shamoun Perverts Scripture Part 1

Sam Shamoun Perverts Scripture Part 2

Sam Shamoun Perverts Scripture Part 3

Sam Shamoun Perverts Scripture Part 4

Sam Shamoun Perverts Scripture Part 5

Shamoun

Response to “How to Refute a Oneness Pentecostal in 60 Seconds”

Skynner vs. Ritchie

Published on Feb 25, 2018

Mr Robert Skynner is one of many who are posting convoluted ideas about what Oneness Pentecostals believe on YouTube. Like most Trinitarian apologists, Mr Skynner also presents his own distorted ideas about what Oneness Pentecostals believe and then attacks his own straw man ideas while pretending that he has refuted Oneness Theology. This video soundly refutes Robert Skynner’s false views about Oneness theology while defending Oneness Pentecostal theology against common Trinitarian assertions.

Skynner

Trinity vs. Oneness: James White vs. Steve Ritchie, Video Response

White vs. Ritchie

Published on Feb 4, 2017

Oneness Pentecostal Apologist Steve Ritchie’s response to Dr. James White’s YouTube Video, “A Quick Review of Oneness Advocate Steve Ritchie,” produced by Alpha and Omega Ministries. This video contains a point by point rebuttal of Dr. James White’s eisegesis of John 17 and Philippians 2 with video clips taken from Dr. White’s own Video: A Quick Review of Oneness Advocate Steve Ritchie.

Oneness vs. Trinity Debate: Dr. James White, ‘A Little Oneness,’ Oneness Response from Steve Ritchie

White vs. Ritchie

Published on Mar 9, 2018

Dr James White posted a video response against my video exposing Dr Edward Dalcour’s misquoting of John 17:5 and Philippians 2:6. Dr White further attacked my exegesis of John 17:5 and Philippians 2:6. Therefore I decided to respond with this video which clearly refutes the false Trinitarian eisegesis of these two passages of scripture.

White

White2

Pentecostal Oneness Heresies, John MacArthur, Oneness Response

McArthur vs. Ritchie

Published on Nov 3, 2017

A refutation of the false accusations against Oneness Pentecostal theology taught by John MacArthur.

MacArthur

Response to David Bercot, What the Early Christians Believed About The Trinity, Oneness vs. Trinity

Bercot vs. Ritchie

Published on Oct 28, 2017

A detailed response exposing David Bercot’s Semi-Arian teaching of the pre-Nicene Semi-Arians which is not true Trinitarian theology. The historical evidence proves that the Oneness Modalists were the Christian majority within the first few centuries of the Christian era and that the Nicene Creed is not a true Trinitarian Creed.

Bercot

Trinity vs. Oneness Debate: Is Jehovah Tri-Personal or Uni-Personal?

Smith vs. Ritchie

Published on Mar 23, 2016

The Trinity vs. Oneness debate was held in Davao City, Philippines on March 6th, 2016. The debate was hosted by the Together Church UPC in Davao City. Pastor Philip Majaducon of Together Church UPC moderated the debate between Oneness Pentecostal Apologist Steven Ritchie and Trinitarian Apologist Ethan Smith.

Smith

Oneness vs. Trinity Debate, Trinitarian Contradictions in the

Smith vs. Ritchie Debate

Published on Apr 29, 2016

Ethan Smith repeatedly contradicted himself in his Trinity vs. Oneness debate with Oneness Apologist Steven Ritchie held on March 6th, 2016 in the Philippines.

Smith 2

Morrison

Oneness vs. Trinity Debate

Ritchie vs. Morrison

Published on December 20, 2015

Ritchie (Oneness) vs. Morrison (Trinity). Oneness Apostolic Apologist Steven Ritchie defends the theological belief of Oneness Pentecostals against the Trinitarian theological view held by the majority of professing Christians.

Trinitarian Apologist Steve Morrison defends the theological belief that God eternally exists in three distinct Persons against the Oneness Pentecostal view that the only true God is the Father Who has manifested Himself as the Son in redemption and as the Holy Spirit in emanation.

PARTS 1 AND 2

PARTS 3 AND 4

Lost Part of Part 4

Trinity vs. Oneness Debate,

Response to CAnswersTV Review of Ritchie vs. Morrison Debate

Morrison2

Is Water Baptism Necessary For Salvation?

Ritchie vs. Bushey

Published on November 25, 2015

Is Water Baptism Necessary For Salvation? Oneness Pentecostal Apologist Steven Ritchie affirms that water baptism through faith in Jesus is necessary for salvation. Evangelical Apologist Richard Bushey denies that water baptism is essential for salvation by affirming that faith alone brings salvation.

Bushey

Trinity vs. Oneness In Church History

Ritchie vs. Albrecht

Published on Oct 8, 2015

This Trinity vs. Oneness Church History Debate covers the first 300 years of Christian history. Oneness Pentecostal Apologist Steven Ritchie affirms that the majority of the earliest Christians (within the first 300 years) believed in Oneness Theology while Roman Catholic Apologist William Albrecht affirms that the majority of the earliest Christians (within the first 300 years) were true Trinitarians.

Oneness Apologist Steve Ritchie claims that there were no true Trinitarians living within the first 250 years of Christian history and that the doctrine of Eternal Sonship (timeless Sonship) did not begin until the mid third century. Trinitarian Apologist William Albrecht claims that the Trinitarian doctrine existed from the earliest days of Christian history.

PART 1

PART 2

PART 3

Albrecht

Albrecht 2

Trinity vs. Oneness Debate:

Ritchie vs. Albrecht

Published on Apr 18, 2015

Oneness vs. Trinity Debate held on Christian Radio on 04/11/15 between Oneness Pentecostal Apologist Steven Ritchie vs. Roman Catholic Apologist William Albrecht.

Albrecht 3

Is God One Person or Three Persons?

Ritchie vs. Bennett

Published on Nov 07, 2011

This debate was held on Long Island, New York, between Pastor Bruce Bennett who affirms Trinitarian Theology and Pastor Steve Ritchie who affirms Oneness Pentecostal Theology.

Bennett

Trinity vs Oneness Debate:

Steve Ritchie vs. Michael Burgos

Published on Nov 21, 2014

Oneness Apologist Steven Ritchie affirms that God the Father existed alone as God prior to the incarnation. Trinitarian Apologist Michael Burgos denies the opening affirmation.

Burgos

Responses To Unitarianism and Arianism

Oneness vs. Arianism Dialogue Debate, Part 1

Published on Aug 22, 2019

Oneness Theologian Pastor Steven Ritchie explains Oneness Theology to those who believe that Jesus Christ was created as a heavenly being under God the Father before the Genesis act of creation.

Dialogue part 1

A Refutation of Unitarian Socinianism and Arianism

Published on May 13, 2017

Irrefutable evidence proving that Unitarian Socinianism and Arianism is unscriptural.

refutation

Denny

Decoding Precepts of Oneness Theology, By Andrew M. Denny Promotes Unitarianism

Published on May 4, 2018

The author (Andrew M. Denny) of the new book, “Decoding Precepts of Oneness Theology,” says that Jesus is not the Father and that God the Father merely indwelt the Son rather than being Emmanuel God with us as a man in the flesh. Since Andrew Denny states that Jesus is not the divine person of God the Father manifested in the flesh as an authentic human being, he is affirming a Unitarian Socinian theology which denies the divinity of Christ rather than a Oneness Apostolic theology which affirms the divinity of Christ. True Oneness Theology affirms that God became a son in the incarnation through the virgin and that God’s new human mode of existence was so fully human that he was also indwelt and led by the Spirit of the Father just like all true prophets were.

modalism vs unitarian

Oneness Modalism vs Unitarian Socinianism

Published on May 25, 2018

The scriptures affirm that Jesus Christ is fully God with us in genuine and full human existence. The Unitarian heresy affirms that Jesus is just a special man in whom the Spirit of God dwells whereas Oneness theology affirms that Jesus is more than just a man because He is God's new human mode/manifestation of the Father's existence in an authentic human life.

raddatz 1

Oneness vs. Unitarianism Debate Part 1, Response to Unitarian Tom Raddatz

Published on Jun 30, 2018

Unitarian Socinian author Tom Raddatz recently posted a scathing polemic attacking Oneness Theology and personally attacking Oneness Apologist’s Pastor Steven Ritchie and Pastor Mark August. This is part 1 of my six part response to Mr. Tom Raddatz. We trust that all Oneness, Unitarian, Arian, and Trinitarian viewers will see that the weight of the evidence proves that only Oneness Theology harmonizes with all of the scriptural and historical evidence.

raddatz 2

Raddatz 3

DEBATEs and video responses

Anderson vs. Ritchie

Published on Feb 1, 2018

Dalcour vs. Ritchie

Published on Jan 11, 2018

related videos

Easy Navigator

WHAT THE EARLY CHRISTIANS BELIEVED ABOUT THE TRINITY, ONENESS VS. TRINITY

​

Part 2| ONENESS MODALISM, THE POPULAR BELIEF IN ANCIENT CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY

Responses To Trinitarianism

Shamoun vs. Ritchie

Published on July 20,2019

Shamoun vs. Ritchie

Published on July 26,2019

Sam Shamoun Perverts Scripture

Skynner vs. Ritchie

Published on Feb 25, 2018

White vs. Ritchie

Published on Feb 4, 2017

White vs. Ritchie

Published on Mar 9, 2018

McArthur vs. Ritchie

Published on Nov 3, 2017

Bercot vs. Ritchie

Published on Oct 28, 2017

Smith vs. Ritchie

Published on Mar 23, 2016

Smith vs. Ritchie Debate

Published on Apr 29, 2016

Ritchie vs. Morrison

Published on December 20, 2015

PARTS 1 AND 2

PARTS 3 AND 4

Lost Part of Part 4

Ritchie vs. Bushey

Published on November 25, 2015

Ritchie vs. Albrecht